|

Criminal background checks now required for
housing aid
By Elizabeth Allen
Asheville, North Carolina, Sept. 17 (AGR)—
Families receiving Section 8 housing vouchers are now required
by federal law to have criminal background checks done by the
local public housing authority (PHA) or the owner of the residence
they are attempting to rent. The screening process is to prevent
a family from receiving aid if any member of their family has
a history of either drug-related or violent criminal activity.
The PHA can decide if the record or incident warrants assistance,
denial or eviction. According to Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) regulations eviction can occur if the “preponderance of
evidence indicates that a family member has engaged in such
activity, regardless of whether the family member has been arrested.”
Section 8 housing vouchers are a type of federal
assistance given to eligible needy families to allow them to
rent a private residence and pay about 30% of their income,
with the remainder being paid by the PHA. Criminal records checks
raise concerns over the rights of those who are seeking housing
assistance. The right to privacy is an issue because the histories
of the families seeking assistance are brought to the attention
of the property owners, the police and the PHA for no reason
other than they have asked for help. In Tucson, Arizona, consumer
advocate Willy Bils feared that search warrants will be easier
to obtain and individuals easier to profile. Locally, homeowners
considering renting to Section 8 families are encouraged to
conduct home visits and to require a credit check, a criminal
check, and landlord references.
Homeless families are of first priority for receiving
aid, but may be denied due to previous criminal records. In
1987 a study conducted by the Urban Institute demonstrated that
one third of the homeless population had spent time in alcohol
or drug treatment and 29% of single homeless men had spent time
in prison. Although dated, the study demonstrates that a large
quantity of the homeless population has problems with drugs
or has a criminal record. Also significant is that the study
only showed how many homeless people had received treatment
for drug problems, not the percentage that were dealing with
drug problems. In order for people with histories of drug problems
to qualify for Section 8 housing, they must be able to prove
that they were addicted to a substance and have recovered, and
may be required to prove they have been involved in a treatment
program.
Angel, a homeless resident of Asheville commented,
“By doing criminal background checks they are denying people
who want to change their life … and then they end up in jail.
I just think it’s dumb man, they are denying people who need
it.”
John Smith, who is disabled and sleeps in a car,
continued, “Hillcrest has fifty or more apartments empty, and
they [the residents] are getting put out for no reason, minor
things…. Too many people out here living in the streets when
they should be living in a place.”
Cheri Honkala of the Kensington Welfare Rights
Union (KWRU), based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, said the
drug screening has become a major obstacle for families trying
to obtain housing. She pointed out that entire families are
rejected and forever ineligible because one of the family members
has chosen to sell drugs out of necessity, it being the highest
paying job available and a particular temptation for youth.
In his book Down and Out in America: the Origins of Homelessness,
Peter Rossi describes the loss of industrialized, unionized
employment in the US in the 1980s as leading to increasing numbers
of individuals and families unable to afford housing. The KWRU
is dealing with the problem by putting families in abandoned
“hot” houses, where they are living day by day.
For Honkala, lack of access to housing rather
than invasion of privacy is the most pressing issue.
“For poor people, our lives are about nothing
but scrutiny, we are really used to constant invasion of privacy,”
she said.
Her statement is reflected in the surveys conducted
in 1969, 1980, and 1990 by James Klugel and Elliot Smith, which
showed the overwhelming majority of US citizens polled as holding
individualistic explanations for poverty such as poor morals,
work skills, or lack of effort or ability as opposed to structural
explanations like lack of adequate schooling, low wages or lack
of jobs. “As a result,” explained French social scientist Robert
Castel in 1978, “the politics of welfare center around the management
of individual deficiencies.” In other words, rather than dealing
with the causes of drug addiction, individual families are refused
housing as punishment for drug-related activity. This denial
of housing contradicts the statement found in the Asheville
Housing Authority’s Tennant Handbook, which claims: “As a US
resident you are entitled by law to safe and decent housing.”
The policy of evicting tenants whose family members
or guests participated in “drug-related criminal activity” was
challenged by four residents of public housing in Oakland, California
who where evicted when their children, grandchildren, or hired
caretakers where caught with drugs. They claimed they had no
knowledge of the activity and asked if the statute requiring
eviction included an “innocent owner” defense and if it does
not, then it is an unconstitutional violation of Due Process
rights. The statute in question was the Anti-Drug Abuse Act
of 1988 which states that each “public housing agency shall
utilize leases… provid[ing] that any drug related criminal activity
on or off [federally assisted low-income housing] premises,
engaged in by a public housing tenant, any member of the tenant’s
household, or any guest or other person under the tenant’s control,
shall be cause of the termination of tenancy.”
After state court eviction proceedings, the cases
were appealed to the 9th Circuit District Court of Appeals which
decided that the “innocent owner” defense was part of congressional
intent and the tenants where entitled to housing. The cases
were then appealed to the Supreme Court and decided in March
of 2002 in HUD v. Rucker. The Court opinion was delivered by
Chief Justice Rehnquist, which all other members joined with
the exception of Justice Breyer who took no part in the consideration
or decision of the case. The Court overturned the 9th Circuit
Court’s decision saying that the inclusion of the word “any”
in the statue meant all drug-related activity “regardless of
whether the tenant knew, or had reason to know, of that activity,”
is grounds for eviction. They went on to state that the statute
is not a violation of Due Process; unjustly depriving a person
of their property, because the government is acting as a landlord,
invoking a clause in a lease which Congress has required and
to which both parties agreed. In addition it’s “not attempting
to criminally punish or civilly regulate respondents as members
of the general populace.” This statute and decision has laid
the groundwork for the legality of background checks and Section
8 housing regulations. Locally, Section 8 applicants are put
on a twelve- to eighteen-month-long waiting list to receive
assistance and the background checks ensue once their name comes
up. About 2 to 3 percent are rejected due to drugs, according
to Section 8 caseworker Marjorie Scavella.
The wait itself hurts applicants because of the
sheer length of time it takes. An Asheville resident, who didn’t
want his name disclosed, explained that people with children
in Department of Social Services custody are depending on housing
in order to get their children back, and subsequently end up
having to wait over a year just to get off the waiting list.
Homeless applicants also have to deal with the wait while living
on the street or in shelters.
Another homeless Asheville resident who wished
to remain anonymous told about an incident with the Salvation
Army shelter, which charges $60 a week. “After I paid they told
me to take a drug test, and when I wouldn’t they kept the $60
and kicked me out. I went to Wal-Mart and bought a tent and
sleeping bag and am staying in them. At least nobody can kick
me out.”
White supremacist Matt Hale protested in
Massachusetts
Compiled By Shawn Gaynor
Sept. 18 (AGR)— Violent skirmishes erupted
in Wakefield, MA Saturday as the World Church of the Creator
(WCotC), a group of white supremacists with a history of violence,
held a speech at a public library given by self-proclaimed “church”
leader Matt Hale. The event at the Wakefield Public Library
forced Main Street to be closed down for three blocks. Over
200 police officers, drawn from throughout the area and brandishing
plastic shields, were lined up in menacing riot-control formations
and perched upon downtown buildings to keep tabs on the crowd
that gathered in opposition to Hale.
One of the white supremacists
who was stuck by anti-racist protesters
“It’s really scary,’’ said an 18-year-old Wakefield
High School student. “They’re allowing them [the supremesists]
to have freedom of speech, but they’re not allowing us the same
thing. It’s our community also.’’
Supporters of Hale were shouted down with obscenities
by over 600 angry townsfolk who had come out to express their
opposition to this hate group.
As “church” supporters began to arrive in the
area, the crowd confronted them, throwing pebbles, and spitting
at them. One white supremacist was hit on the head with a stick,
as some townspeople screamed, “You fuckin’ deserve it.”
Blocked from following the “church” members into
the library, a throng of young protesters pressed in on police
barricades, chanting ‘’Let us in.’’ Police first said the room’s
75 seats were full, but eventually found room for a handful
of Hale’s opponents.
Several protesters inside the library disrupted
the meeting, as roughly 40 “church” members chanted Nazi slogans
and performed Nazi salutes. Opponents of the “church” chanted,
“Smash the Nazis; we must unite.’’ Two disruptive protesters
were removed from the meeting by police.
During the speech Hale said, “The World Church
of the Creator hates in self-defense.’’
Fighting broke out a second time as “church” supporters
emerged from the library. Several anti-racist protesters snuck
up behind one of the white supremacists and smacked him over
the head repeatedly. The burly neo-nazi crumbled to the ground
with a whimper, yelping “Help, police!”
A young woman from Wakefield was one of the loudest
opponents, getting in the face of several Hale supporters.
“The last thing I’m going to do is let somebody
make me fear where I live,’’ she said.
Wakefield police said four people were arrested
on disorderly conduct charges and onlookers reported scattered
fights and several minor injuries. Edward Harris, dispatched
by the US Justice Department to Wakefield as a conciliation
specialist to assist police, said, “If folks are not obeying,
if they’re violent by throwing rocks or [other means], they’re
going to get arrested. And that’s exactly what happened.”
Another Wakefield woman and her husband brought
their two boys, 10-year-old Nicholas and 7-year-old Maverick,
to hear Hale and his hateful disciples.
“It’s crazy that they would even come here,’’
she said. “I don’t want my sons to grow up thinking hate is
OK in any way, shape or form.’’
The World Church of the Creator gained notoriety
in 1999, when member Benjamin Smith shot two dead and injured
nine others in a Midwest killing spree. Since then, Hale says
his organization’s membership has grown. Erica Chase, recently
convicted in Boston in a bomb plot with her neo-Nazi boyfriend,
Leo Felton, was a member of the church.
Several recent WCofC meetings have been disrupted
by outraged citizens, most notably in January of this year in
York, Pennsylvania, where white supremacists and crowds of anti-racists
clashed in running street fights. During that incident a white
supremacist fired shots from a pistol in a parking lot altercation,
and another hit several protesters with his pick-up truck.
Jonathan Crowell, an anti-racist who was accused
of assaulting a police horse at that event, was found not guilty
this week by a York jury. Trials are still pending for several
anti-racists facing lesser charges.
Sources: Boston Globe, Boston Herald. additional
information from AGR staff
Relatives of Sept. 11 victims reject more
violence
By Katherine Stapp
New York, New York, Sept. 11 (IPS)— When
US President George W. Bush addressed the nation from New York’s
historic Ellis Island on Wednesday, dozens of families who lost
loved ones last Sept. 11 tuned out. They were holding their
own vigil to honor the dead - and to denounce the administration’s
“war on terror.” “My brother Jim died on the 95th floor of the
North Tower,” said David Potorti, a member of ‘September 11
Families for Peaceful Tomorrows’. “This is a really emotional
time.”
But Potorti, and about 40 other relatives of those
killed in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania, strongly believe
that US military action - in Afghanistan, the Philippines, and
imminently against Iraq - will only cause greater suffering.
“Sept. 11 must not continue to be used to promote
more war and violence,” said Colleen Kelly, whose brother William
perished at the World Trade Center that day, one year ago.
The group is now on a national speaking tour in
hopes that their coming forward will inspire Americans to question
the Bush administration’s response to the catastrophe. Their
name is taken from a quote by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
in which he says “wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful
tomorrows.”
When September 11 Families formed in the weeks
following the attacks, and publicly condemned the invasion of
Afghanistan, “there was tremendous fear and anger,” Potorti
said. “Speaking out at that time was a very brave act.”
While the administration has not altered its initial
stance of “with us or against us,” Potorti said his group has
found a groundswell of support here and abroad.
“Thousands of Americans are deeply concerned about
where our country is heading,” he said.
Rangina Hamidi, an Afghan-American touring with
September 11 Families, pointed out that the vast majority of
events to commemorate the attacks ignore the civilian casualties
incurred during the ouster of the repressive Taliban regime
in Afghanistan.
“We are also approaching the anniversary of the
bombing of Afghanistan, in which thousands of people lost their
lives, probably at least 10,000, although we will never know
exactly how many,” she said.
September 11 Families is pressuring Bush to create
a $20million fund to aid Afghan families who lost members in
the war. So far, the president has refused to meet with them.
On their own, they have collected and distributed $7,000.
They say they have also found some measure of
solace.
For others, especially those injured in the attacks,
just getting through the day is an achievement.
Gary Smiley, a veteran paramedic from Brooklyn,
lay pinned under the smoking ruins of the South Tower for at
least two hours before an unknown fireman dug him out. He was
certain he would die.
Smiley lost 27 friends and colleagues that day.
Two fire chiefs were killed within inches of him. He managed
to carry out several people before being buried in a blizzard
of debris.
When Smiley got out of the hospital, he immediately
went back to ground zero and delved into the hellish task of
sifting through the rubble in search of survivors, then bodies.
He found many, maybe some of them people he knew. Paradoxically,
it was the only place he felt safe.
A year later, he is suffering from post-traumatic
stress disorder. The city is giving him a prestigious “rescue
survivor” ribbon next month, but it means little, he says.
“I’m not reconciled at all with what happened,”
said Smiley, who has continued to work as a paramedic. “They
keep telling us to just get over it. Well, I can’t get over
it. My greatest fear is that after it’s all said and done, they’ll
forget about us.”
He feels left out of the vast web of relief efforts,
most of which are directed at relatives rather than rescue workers
who were on the scene.
“The biggest problem is that there’s nothing for
the survivors,” he said. “The firemen have the firehouse to
go to. But we’ve been getting the run-around from almost every
group.”
Timothy Cusack, also a long-time New York City
paramedic, agreed that emergency medical technicians and paramedics
have been sidelined. This may be due to the cold arithmetic
of attrition -- 343 fire-fighters, 23 police officers and eight
emergency medical services workers perished at the World Trade
Center.
Still, “everybody’s bitter about it,” he said.
“It’s not like it’s a year later and the city is remembering
what we did. Morale is at rock bottom.”
What will be done with the site - now a raw hole
in the ground - is uncertain. The city just rejected six proposals
for rebuilding due to overwhelming public antipathy, and reopened
bidding to US and international architectural firms.
As the anniversary looms, average New Yorkers
-- those who neither lost someone nor were at the towers --
are marking the date in different ways.
Stephanie, a high school teacher in Brooklyn,
said her school had nothing formal planned for Sept. 11. “Different
teachers are doing what’s right for them,” she said. “We don’t
want to traumatize the kids by talking about it every single
period. I’ll probably have my kids write an essay.”
“The main thing I learned is that what I believe
is not always right,” said Stephanie, who did not want her last
name used. “When (former New York mayor) Rudy Giuliani -- who
I loathe -- came on television, I said, ‘thank God, this megalomaniacal
demagogue will protect us’.”
Stephanie was lucky. Her brother was at the World
Trade Center on the morning of Sept. 11, and describes it as
one of the worst days of his life. He says he will never forget
watching scores of people jump from the burning South Tower.
“First it was one at a time, then two, some holding
hands, then four, then six, then one and two again,” he recounted.
“Men and women were weeping, holding each other up as the emotional
pain was too much for many of us. They would not stop coming
out of that building. I stopped counting the jumpers at 30,
it became too painful.”
It was then, he said, that the rest of the South
Tower “sheared off and came down.”
For the September 11 Families, the events of
that day are “something from which we will never recover, not
in one year, not in a lifetime.”
But “responding to violence with violence only
escalates the suffering, creating fresh wounds and breeding
more resentment,” Potorti said.
Norton found in contempt for handling of
trust fund
Sept. 17— A federal judge today held Secretary
of Interior Gale Norton in contempt of court for her handling
of the Indian trust fund.

Secretary of Interior
Gale Norton
US District Judge Royce Lamberth in a 265-page
opinion found Norton guilty of concealing information from the
court, providing false and misleading information to the court
and failing to protect the assets of 500,000 American Indians.
Also held in contempt was Assistant Secretary Neal McCaleb,
head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Norton and McCaleb, the opinion states, are “unfit
to be trustee-delegates.” “The Department of Interior has truly
outdone itself this time,” Lamberth wrote. “The agency has indisputably
proven to the court, Congress, and the individual Indian beneficiaries
that it is either unwilling or unable to administer competently
the IIM trust.”
The decision comes after a several-month wait.
Lamberth wrapped up proceedings in February after a grueling
trial which delved into nearly two years of history under both
the Clinton and Bush administrations. The complexity of the
issues was reflected in Lamberth’s lengthy ruling. He specifically
found Norton and McCaleb in contempt on four of five charges
they faced.
On the first charge — the failure to start an
historical accounting of funds owed to Indian beneficiaries
— Lamberth found litigation misconduct. The next three charges
related to the failure of the Department of Interior to provide
information about the accounting and the status of a $40 million
software accounting system.
The final charge concerned the dismal computer
security protections of the Indian trust. Lamberth found that
hackers can easily break into the system and steal money belonging
to Indian people without leaving a trace. Despite the slam-dunk
decision, Lamberth will not appoint a court receiver to oversee
Indian assets. But in a significant rejection of the Bush administration’s
position, he found that he has the constitutional authority
to do so.
Lamberth also increased court oversight of the
Interior, which the administration has also resisted. He increased
the role of court monitor Joseph S. Kieffer, a former military
intelligence specialist whom Norton wants removed from the case.
Attorneys for Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff
in the case, were elated. They plan to ask for court fees and
move forward with the landmark class action in hopes of settling
the trust accounts.
John Wright, a spokesperson for the Interior said
the department would comment shortly.
Source: Indianz.com
Hundreds rally at Justice Dept.
Hundreds of protesters marched to the Department
of Justice Friday, Sept. 13, accusing the attorney general of
using racial profiling.
Demonstrators feel Attorney General John Ashcroft
has a closed-door policy and ignores the rights of those accused,
including those put into custody during the “war on terror.”
“We have people who are being held today, we don’t know who
they are [and] we don’t know where they are,” said James Zogby
of the Arab American Institute.
“We and they don’t know the charges against them
and they don’t have the right to an attorney. In some cases,
people have been deported without their families even knowing
where they are.”
People came from as far as Atlanta, GA and many
were part of larger organizations such as the NAACP, National
Organization of Women, and the ACLU. (www.nbc4.com)
Jackson dismisses Founding Fathers
The Rev. Jesse Jackson on Sept. 15 told about
600 Michigan State University students that US democracy was
37 years old, not 200-plus, and that “democracy as we know it
did not begin in Philadelphia, where a bunch of white men wrote
the laws.”
“These men’s wives were not allowed [to vote],
these laws were made at a time when only white men had the right
to vote,” Mr. Jackson said, noting that the Voting Rights Act
of 1965 was the commencement of “true democracy.”
Any military action in Iraq, he said, at this
point would violate UN and international law. He also noted
that the US has a history of supporting political despots. ”We
supported the shah of Iran, and we drove the Islamic revolution
into being,” Jackson said. “They saw us as allies of oppression.
We supported the Taliban. We gave $6 million to
the Taliban. The Taliban was our ally until Sept. 11.” (Washington
Times)
SOA Watch activists begin federal prison
term
On Tuesday, Sept. 10, 23 human rights activists
reported to federal prison. They were among the 37 who went
to trial in July for civil disobedience at the School of the
Americas (renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security
Cooperation) in Columbus, Georgia. The 37 were among 10,000
who gathered in a massive protest last November to demand the
closure of the school. The defendants peacefully crossed onto
Fort Benning, the site of the school. Thirty-six of the defendants
were convicted of trespass, with sentences ranging from six
months probation to six months in federal prison and $5000 in
fines. (www.soaw.org)
Nuke plant workers may discuss exposure
to harmful materials
The federal government announced in a Pentagon
report released Sept. 16 that former employees at a nuclear
weapons plant in Iowa will be allowed to talk to doctors and
researchers about their exposure to harmful materials, despite
an oath the workers took not to discuss details about their
jobs. The oaths have been a hurdle for thousands of employees
seeking medical care or federal benefits, or who want to take
part in health studies.
Workers will be able to say which harmful materials
they worked with, but not how each substance was used.
From the late 1940s through the mid-1970s, the
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant in Middletown assembled and test-fired
nuclear weapons components. It continues to produce conventional
weapons. The employee letter says workers may have been exposed
to silica, beryllium, solvents, explosives, epoxies, and heavy
metals.
The report also identifies more than 38,500 workers
who are eligible for a new study on the health effects of exposure
to radioactive and hazardous materials, and says the government
has identified nearly 4,000 who were assigned to the section
where nuclear components were assembled and test-fired. (AP)
Decades-old surveillance files surface in
Portland
A former Portland police officer decades ago removed
more than 30 boxes of police surveillance records and photos
on political activists and groups from the 1960s to early 1980s
that, by state law, should have been destroyed in 1981.
The records were discovered 15 years after the
officer’s death in 1987.
But the passage of time has not lessened the concerns
of local activists, but it has fueled their frustrations with
law enforcement. With a hearing scheduled Thursday on whether
the City Council should renew Portland police participation
in the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force, critics plan to use
the files as fodder for arguing for stronger oversight of police
intelligence gathering.
The records — including files on Mayor Vera Katz,
American Civil Liberties Union members and former Gov. Neil
Goldschmidt — were discovered 15 years after the officer, Winfield
Falk, died in 1987.
One of the two sets of “subversives” files kept
by the Portland Police Bureau dealt with suspected communists
and labor radicals, or “Wobblies,” between the first and second
World Wars. The second set of files dealt mostly with Vietnam-era
activists of the 1960s and 1970s ranging from civil rights protesters
to members of radical movements such as the Black Panthers.
In the 1970s, when the bureau handed over intelligence
gathered on the ACLU to the organization, it maintained the
information represented virtually everything the bureau had,
said Dave Fidanque of the ACLU of Oregon.
But the file on the ACLU that Falk held onto included
intelligence gathered as late as 1982 or 1983, he said. It contained
newspaper clippings, ACLU newsletters, and membership lists.
“The assurances have been unequivocal that this
activity stopped in the ’70s” Fidanque said, “but we know that
isn’t true.”
A 1981 state law prohibits police from collecting
or maintaining information about the political, religious or
social views of any individual or group unless the information
is part of a criminal investigation and involves criminal conduct.
Any state records that did not comply with state law were to
be purged. (Portland Oregonian)
Man takes pot shots at drug chopper
A Missouri National Guard helicopter on a marijuana
eradication mission in the southwest Missouri Ozarks was brought
down by gunfire on Sept. 3. The chopper was disabled, but the
pilot brought it down safely and neither he nor his passengers
were injured.
Missouri police charged Jimmy Leroy Shriver with
twice shooting at the copter as it flew over his property. A
search of his property turned up no drugs, but two stolen shotguns.
He was also charged in federal court with being a felon in possession
of a firearm. He was convicted of possession of a controlled
substance in 1998. (DRCNet)
|